In 1967, the U. S. Congress passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which protects workers age 40 or older from employment discrimination based on their age. Anyone who employs 20 or more people is subject to ADEA; it covers hiring, firing, compensation and benefits, training, job assignments, promotions, and layoffs.
There are two different approaches that a plaintiff may take when filing an age discrimination suit, "disparate treatment" and "disparate impact." DISPARATE IMPACT cases require the plaintiff to prove that an employment decision disproportionately affects members of a protected group (in this case, those over 40). In other words, in a disparate impact case, the discriminatory effect is what matters, even if the employer's intent was not discriminatory. Courts that recognize the disparate impact argument in age discrimination cases often require companies to prove "business necessity." For example, if a disproportionate number of employees affected by a layoff are over 40, the company will have to prove that those people were let go because their salaries were disproportionately high and that the company would face financial hardship if they were allowed to stay on.
Where are those lay off drivers from anaheim terminal Bill M and Bob K they will file age discrimination law suit Roy Tailor we need your lawyer phone # call us please whittier line drivers over 40 join the club.
what's going to happen in Anahein and Whittier SBO BKF SAC OXN SDO FTA SFV LOS IVN OAK FNO OTM with so many seniors line and shuttles drivers over 40 are they going to be fire too" SHAME ON YOU FEDEX FREIGHT" WHT DRIVER.
4 comments:
In 1967, the U. S. Congress passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which protects workers age 40 or older from employment discrimination based on their age. Anyone who employs 20 or more people is subject to ADEA; it covers hiring, firing, compensation and benefits, training, job assignments, promotions, and layoffs.
There are two different approaches that a plaintiff may take when filing an age discrimination suit, "disparate treatment" and "disparate impact." DISPARATE IMPACT cases require the plaintiff to prove that an employment decision disproportionately affects members of a protected group (in this case, those over 40). In other words, in a disparate impact case, the discriminatory effect is what matters, even if the employer's intent was not discriminatory. Courts that recognize the disparate impact argument in age discrimination cases often require companies to prove "business necessity." For example, if a disproportionate number of employees affected by a layoff are over 40, the company will have to prove that those people were let go because their salaries were disproportionately high and that the company would face financial hardship if they were allowed to stay on.
University of Phoenix (Employment 101)
Where are those lay off drivers from anaheim terminal Bill M and Bob K they will file age discrimination law suit Roy Tailor we need your lawyer phone # call us please whittier line drivers over 40 join the club.
what's going to happen in Anahein and Whittier SBO BKF SAC OXN SDO FTA SFV LOS IVN OAK FNO OTM with so many seniors line and shuttles drivers over 40 are they going to be fire too" SHAME ON YOU FEDEX FREIGHT" WHT DRIVER.
Here's the website for the attorney in the Taulor case. http://laborlawoffice.com/r case.
Post a Comment